Material Selection Guide
Plastics are increasingly being used to replace other materials like bronze, stainless steel, aluminum and ceramics. The most popular reasons for switching to plastics include:
- Longer part life
- Elimination of lubrication
- Reduced wear on mating parts
- Faster operation of equipment/line speeds
- Less power needed to run equipment
- Corrosion resistance and inertness
- Weight reduction
With the many plastic materials available today, selecting the best one can be an intimidating proposition. Here are guidelines to assist those less familiar with these plastics.
Determine whether the component is a:
- Bearing and Wear Application (i.e., frictional forces) OR
- Structural (static or dynamic) Application
Determining the primary function of the finished component will direct you to a group of materials. For example, crystalline materials (i.e., Nylon, Acetal) outperform amorphous materials (i.e., Polysulfone, Duratron® PEI or Polycarbonate) in bearing and wear applications. Within the material groups, you can further reduce your choices by knowing what additives are best suited to your application.
Wear properties are enhanced by MoS2, graphite, carbon fiber and polymeric lubricants (i.e., PTFE, waxes).
Structural properties are enhanced by reinforcement fibres like glass or carbon.
Once you have determined the nature of the application (B&W or Structural), you can further reduce your material choices by determining the application's mechanical property requirements. For bearing and wear applications, the first consideration is wear performance expressed in PV and"k" -factor. Calculate the PV (pressure (psi) x velocity (m/min) required. Using Figure 1, select materials whose limiting PV's are above the PV you have calculated for the application. Further selection can be made by noting the "k" wear factor of your material choices. In general the lower the "k" factor, the longer the wear life of the material.
Structural components are commonly designed for maximum continuous operating stresses equal to 25% of their ultimate strength at a specific temperature. This guideline is meant to compensate for the viscoelastic behavior of plastics that result in creep. Isometric stress-time curves are provided here to help you characterize a material's strength behavior as a function of time at both room temperature (Figure 2) and at 150 °C (300 °F) (Figure 3).
Consider the thermal requirements of your application using both typical and extreme conditions.
A material's heat resistance is characterized by both its heat deflection temperature (HDT) and continuous service temperature. HDT is an indication of a material's softening temperature and is generally accepted as a maximum temperature limit for moderately to highly stressed, unconstrained components. Continuous service temperature is generally reported as the temperature above which significant, permanent physical property degradation occurs after long term exposure. This guideline is not to be confused with continuous operation or use temperatures reported by regulatory agencies such as Underwriters Laboratories UL.
The melting point of crystalline materials and glass transition temperature of amorphous materials are the short-term temperature extremes to which form stability is maintained. Most engineering plastics should not be used at or above these temperatures since polymers loose most of their mechanical characteristics at these temperatures.
Consider chemicals to which the material will be exposed during use and cleaning.
Quadrant provides chemical compatibility information as a guideline in this brochure although it can be difficult to predict since concentration, temperature, time and stress each have a role in defining suitability for use. Nylon, acetal and Ertalyte® PET-P are generally suitable for industrial environments. Crystalline high performance materials such as Fluorosint® filled PTFE, Techtron® PPS and Ketron™ PEEK are more suitable for aggressive chemical environments (See Figure 5). We strongly recommend that you test under end-use conditions. Specific chemical resistance can be found on the property comparison chart.
Before proceeding to steps 5-7 it may be appropriate to consider additional material characteristics including:
- Relative Impact Resistance/Toughness
- Dimensional Stability
- Regulatory/Agency Compliance
Materials with higher tensile elongation, Izod impact and tensile impact strengths are generally tougher and less notch sensitive for shock loading applications (See Table 1).
|Mechanical Property Comparisons|
(room temp. 23 °C 73 °F)
(24hr. in moisture environment)
|Nylatron® NSM Nylon||11,000||14,000||475,000||20||0.5||0.25|
|Acetron® GP Acetal||9,500||15,000||400,000||30||1.0||0.2|
|Duratron® U1000 PEI||16,500||22,000||500,000||80||0.5||0.25|
|Duratron® U2300 PEI||17,000||32,000||900,000||3||1.0||0.18|
|40% GF Ryton* PPS||13,000||24,000||1,000,000||2||1.0||0.02|
|Ketron® 1000 PEEK||16,000||20,000||600,000||20||1.0||0.10|
|Ketron GF30 PEEK||18,000||26,000||1,000,000||3||1.4||0.10|
|Duratron® T4203 PAI||18,000||30,000||600,000||5||2.0||0.33|
|Duratron® T4301 PAI||12,000||24,000||1,000,000||3||0.8||0.28|
|Duratron® T5530 PAI||14,000||27,000||900,000||3||0.7||0.30|
Engineering plastics can expand and contract with temperature changes 10 to 15 times more than many metals including steel. The coefficient of linear thermal expansion (CLTE) is used to estimate the expansion rate for engineering plastic materials. CLTE is reported both as a function of temperature and as an average value. Figure 6 shows how many different engineering plastics react to increased temperature.
Modulus of elasticity and water absorption also contribute to the dimensional stability of a material. Be sure to consider the effects of humidity and steam.
Agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Underwriters Laboratory (UL), 3A-Diary Association and American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) commonly approve or set specific guidelines for material usage within their industrial segments.
Select the most cost-effective shape for your part.
Quadrant offers designers the broadest size and configuration availability. Be sure to investigate all of the shape possibilities — you can reduce your fabrication costs by obtaining the most economical shape.
Consider Quadrant's many processing alternatives.
Rod, plate, strip, profiles,
tubular bar, bushing stock
|Large stock shapes|
Near net shapes
Rod, plate, tubular bar, near,
|Small Shapes in advanced|
Rod, disc, plate, tubular bar
|Small shapes in advanced|
Rod, disc, plate, tubular bar
Note: From process to process, many material choices remain the same. However, there are physical property differences based upon the processing technique used to make the shape.
- Injection molded parts exhibit the greatest anisotropy (properties are directionally dependent).
- Extruded products exhibit slightly anisotropic behavior.
- Compression molded products are isotropic — they exhibit equal properties in all directions.
Determine the machinability of your material options.
Machinability can also be a material selection criterion. All of the Quadrant products in this site are stress relieved to enhance machinability. In general, glass and carbon reinforced grades are considerably more abrasive on tooling and are more notch sensitive during machining than unfilled grades. Reinforced grades are commonly more stable during machining.
Because of their extreme hardness, imidized materials (i.e., Duratron® PAI, Duratron® PI and Duratron® PBI) can be challenging to fabricate. Carbide and polycrystalline diamond tools should be used during machining of these materials. To aid you in assessing machinability, a relative rating for each material can be found on the property comparison charts.
Make sure you receive what you specify.
The properties listed in this site are for Quadrant EPP's materials only. Be sure you are not purchasing an inferior product. Request product certifications when you order.
All material have inherent limitations that must be considered when designing parts. To make limitations clear, each material profiled in this site has an Engineering Notes section dedicated to identifying these attributes.
We hope our candor about material strengths and weaknesses simplifies your selection process. For additional information, please contact Quadrant EPP's Technical Services Department.
Additional Information on Material Performance
Engineering Plastics are more or less flammable. Their flammability depends on the chemical structure, the fillers and additives, the environment - rich in oxygen or not, the ambient temperature, the part geometry, the presence or not of the ignition source, ect. Through the action of fire, certain polymers burn easily, others with difficulty or even not at all.
- Classification* according to UL94
- Oxygen Index (ISO 4589)
The Oxygen Index is certainly one of the most relevant tests, easy to reproduce. The test consists of measuring the critical oxygen concentration in a mixture O2 - N2, allowing inflammation under defined conditions. If the Oxygen index is lower than 21%, the material will burn easily in air after removing the ignition source. The higher the Oxygen index, the more difficult the material will ignite.
according to UL94
3.0 mm 6.0 mm
ASTM D 2863
Ertalon® 6 SA HB HB 25 Ertalon® 66 SA HB HB 26 Ertalon® 66 SA-C HB HB 24 Ertalon® 4.6 HB HB 24 Ertalon® 66-GF30 HB HB - Ertalon® 6 PLA HB HB 25 Ertalon® 6 XAU+ HB HB 25 Ertalon® LFX HB HB - Nylatron® MC 901 HB HB 25 Nylatron® GSM HB HB 25 Nylatron® NSM HB HB - Nylatron® GS HB HB 26 Ertacetal® C HB HB 15 Ertacetal® H HB HB 15 Ertacetal® H-TF HB HB - Ertalyte® HB HB 25 Ertalyte® TX HB HB 25 PC 1000 HB HB 25 Duratron® PBI V-0 V-0 58 Duratron® T4203 PAI V-0 V-0 45 Duratron® T4301 PAI V-0 V-0 44 Duratron® T5530 PAI V-0 V-0 50 Ketron® PEEK-1000 V-0 V-0 35 Ketron® PEEK-HPV V-0 V-0 43 Ketron® PEEK-GF30 V-0 V-0 40 Ketron® PEEK-CA30 V-0 V-0 40 Techtron® HPV PPS V-0 V-0 47 Quadrant® PPSU V-0 V-0 44 Duratron® U1000 PEI V-0 V-0 47 Quadrant® PSU 1000 HB HB 30 Fluorosint® 500 V-0 V-0 - Fluorosint® 207 V-0 V-0 - Semitron® ESd 225 - HB < 20 Semitron® ESd 410C V-0 V-0 47 Semitron® ESd 500HR V-0 V-0 - Semitron® ESd 520HR V-0 V-0 48
Note: These mostly estimated ratings, derived from raw material supplier data, are not intended to reflect hazards presented by materials under actual fire conditions.
In 1995, a number of Quadrant Engineering Plastic Products materials were tested according to the European Space Agency (ESA)-specification PSS-01-702 ("A thermal vacuum test for the screening of space materials"). Samples were heated to 125°C for 24 hours (Method "A"), collector plates kept at 25°C and the testing carried out in a vacuum of 10-3 P.
TML (%) RML (%) CVCM (%) Ertalon® 66 SA 1.3 0.17 0.002 Ertalon® 6 PLA 1.5 0.06 0.005 Ertacetal® C 0.34 0.13 0.016 Ertacetal® H 0.47 0.24 0.005 Ertalyte® 0.33 0.2 0.005 Ertalyte® TX 0.25 0.03 0.003 Duratron® PBI 2.2 0.84 0.014 Duratron® T4203 PAI 1.9 0.93 0.007 Duratron® T4301 PAI 1.4 0.42 0.018 Ketron® PEEK-1000 0.26 0.03 0.003 Ketron® PEEK-HPV 0.16 0.02 0.003 Techtron® HPV PPS 0.06 0.02 0.003 Duratron® U1000 PEI 0.82 0.32 0.002 Quadrant® PSU 1000 0.49 0.09 0.002
TML = Total Mass Loss
RML = Recovered Mass Loss
CVCM = Collected Volatile Condensed Material
Steam sterilization is commonly used in the medical industry for sterilizing all kinds of reusable equipment, devices, instruments, trays, ect. and is conducted in a pressurized vessel that allows the presence of superheated saturated steam. The main purpose of sterilization is to kill all viable micro-organisms on a certain part.
Tests in which the effect of repeated steam sterilization on the charpy notched impact strength was measured according to ISO 179-1/1eA (measured on dry test specimens at 23°C) clearly show that :
- Duratron® U1000 PEI, Ketron® PEEK-1000 and Quadrant® PPSU are very suitable for repeated steam sterilization
- Quadrant® PSU 1000 and Techtron® HPV PPS also offer good steam sterilization, up to 500 cycles
- Ertacetal® C and Ertalyte® can be used for parts which will only be steam sterilized a few times.