Home »   ...  » Support » Material Selection Guide

Material Selection Guide

Plastics are increasingly being used to replace other materials like bronze, stainless steel, aluminum and ceramics. The most popular reasons for switching to plastics include:

  • Longer part life
  • Elimination of lubrication
  • Reduced wear on mating parts
  • Faster operation of equipment/line speeds
  • Less power needed to run equipment
  • Corrosion resistance and inertness
  • Weight reduction

 

With the many plastic materials available today, selecting the best one can be an intimidating proposition. Here are guidelines to assist those less familiar with these plastics.

Determine whether the component is a:

  • Bearing and Wear Application (i.e., frictional forces) OR
  • Structural (static or dynamic) Application

Determining the primary function of the finished component will direct you to a group of materials. For example, crystalline materials (i.e., Nylon, Acetal) outperform amorphous materials (i.e., Polysulfone, Duratron®  PEI or Polycarbonate) in bearing and wear applications. Within the material groups, you can further reduce your choices by knowing what additives are best suited to your application.

Wear properties are enhanced by MoS2, graphite, carbon fiber and polymeric lubricants (i.e., PTFE, waxes).

Structural properties are enhanced by reinforcement fibres like glass or carbon.

Once you have determined the nature of the application (B&W or Structural), you can further reduce your material choices by determining the application's mechanical property requirements. For bearing and wear applications, the first consideration is wear performance expressed in PV and"k" -factor. Calculate the PV (pressure (psi) x velocity (m/min) required. Using Figure 1, select materials whose limiting PV's are above the PV you have calculated for the application. Further selection can be made by noting the "k" wear factor of your material choices. In general the lower the "k" factor, the longer the wear life of the material.

Structural components are commonly designed for maximum continuous operating stresses equal to 25% of their ultimate strength at a specific temperature. This guideline is meant to compensate for the viscoelastic behavior of plastics that result in creep. Isometric stress-time curves are provided here to help you characterize a material's strength behavior as a function of time at both room temperature (Figure 2) and at 150 °C (300 °F) (Figure 3).

Consider the thermal requirements of your application using both typical and extreme conditions.

A material's heat resistance is characterized by both its heat deflection temperature (HDT) and continuous service temperature. HDT is an indication of a material's softening temperature and is generally accepted as a maximum temperature limit for moderately to highly stressed, unconstrained components. Continuous service temperature is generally reported as the temperature above which significant, permanent physical property degradation occurs after long term exposure. This guideline is not to be confused with continuous operation or use temperatures reported by regulatory agencies such as Underwriters Laboratories UL.

The melting point of crystalline materials and glass transition temperature of amorphous materials are the short-term temperature extremes to which form stability is maintained. Most engineering plastics should not be used at or above these temperatures since polymers loose most of their mechanical characteristics at these temperatures.

Consider chemicals to which the material will be exposed during use and cleaning.

Quadrant provides chemical compatibility information as a guideline in this brochure although it can be difficult to predict since concentration, temperature, time and stress each have a role in defining suitability for use. Nylon, acetal and Ertalyte® PET-P are generally suitable for industrial environments. Crystalline high performance materials such as Fluorosint® filled PTFE, Techtron® PPS and Ketron™ PEEK are more suitable for aggressive chemical environments (See Figure 5). We strongly recommend that you test under end-use conditions. Specific chemical resistance can be found on the property comparison chart.

Before proceeding to steps 5-7 it may be appropriate to consider additional material characteristics including:

  • Relative Impact Resistance/Toughness
  • Dimensional Stability
  • Regulatory/Agency Compliance

Materials with higher tensile elongation, Izod impact and tensile impact strengths are generally tougher and less notch sensitive for shock loading applications (See Table 1).

Mechanical Property Comparisons
 Tensile
Strength
psi
Compressive
Strength
psi
Flexural
Modulus
psi
Elongation
%
Izod
Impact
(room temp. 23 °C  73 °F)
Water
Absorp.
(24hr. in moisture environment)
Nylatron® NSM Nylon11,00014,000475,000200.50.25
Acetron® GP Acetal9,50015,000400,000301.00.2
Ertalyte® PET-P12,40015,000490,000200.50.07
Quadrant PPSU11,00013,400345,000302.50.37
Duratron® U1000 PEI16,50022,000500,000800.50.25
Duratron® U2300 PEI17,00032,000900,00031.00.18
Fluorosint®500 PEI1,1004,000500,000100.90.10
Techtron® PPS13,50021,500575,000150.60.01
40% GF Ryton* PPS13,00024,0001,000,00021.00.02
Ketron® 1000 PEEK16,00020,000600,000201.00.10
Ketron GF30 PEEK18,00026,0001,000,00031.40.10
Duratron® T4203 PAI18,00030,000600,00052.00.33
Duratron® T4301 PAI12,00024,0001,000,00030.80.28
Duratron® T5530 PAI14,00027,000900,00030.70.30
Duratron® PI13,50019,000530,00030.60.62
Duratron®  PBI23,00050,000950,00030.50.40

TABLE 1

Engineering plastics can expand and contract with temperature changes 10 to 15 times more than many metals including steel. The coefficient of linear thermal expansion (CLTE) is used to estimate the expansion rate for engineering plastic materials. CLTE is reported both as a function of temperature and as an average value. Figure 6 shows how many different engineering plastics react to increased temperature.

Modulus of elasticity and water absorption also contribute to the dimensional stability of a material. Be sure to consider the effects of humidity and steam.

Agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Underwriters Laboratory (UL), 3A-Diary Association and American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) commonly approve or set specific guidelines for material usage within their industrial segments.

Select the most cost-effective shape for your part.

Quadrant offers designers the broadest size and configuration availability. Be sure to investigate all of the shape possibilities — you can reduce your fabrication costs by obtaining the most economical shape.

Consider Quadrant's many processing alternatives.

For: Choose:
Long lengths
Small diameters

Rod, plate, strip, profiles,
tubular bar, bushing stock
Extrusion
Large stock shapes
Near net shapes

Rod, plate, tubular bar, near,
net configurations
Casting
Small Shapes in advanced
engineering materials

Rod, disc, plate, tubular bar
Compression
Molding
Small shapes in advanced
engineering materials
Small diameters

Rod, disc, plate, tubular bar
Injection Molding

Note: From process to process, many material choices remain the same. However, there are physical property differences based upon the processing technique used to make the shape.

For example:

  • Injection molded parts exhibit the greatest anisotropy (properties are directionally dependent).
  • Extruded products exhibit slightly anisotropic behavior.
  • Compression molded products are isotropic — they exhibit equal properties in all directions.

Determine the machinability of your material options.

Machinability can also be a material selection criterion. All of the Quadrant products in this site are stress relieved to enhance machinability. In general, glass and carbon reinforced grades are considerably more abrasive on tooling and are more notch sensitive during machining than unfilled grades. Reinforced grades are commonly more stable during machining.

Because of their extreme hardness, imidized materials (i.e., Duratron® PAI, Duratron® PI and Duratron® PBI) can be challenging to fabricate. Carbide and polycrystalline diamond tools should be used during machining of these materials. To aid you in assessing machinability, a relative rating for each material can be found on the property comparison charts.

Make sure you receive what you specify.

The properties listed in this site are for Quadrant EPP's materials only. Be sure you are not purchasing an inferior product. Request product certifications when you order.

Engineering Notes:

All material have inherent limitations that must be considered when designing parts. To make limitations clear, each material profiled in this site has an Engineering Notes section dedicated to identifying these attributes.

We hope our candor about material strengths and weaknesses simplifies your selection process. For additional information, please contact Quadrant EPP's Technical Services Department.

Additional Information on Material Performance

  • keyboard_arrow_downFlammability Performance

    Engineering Plastics are more or less flammable. Their flammability depends on the chemical structure, the fillers and additives, the environment - rich in oxygen or not, the ambient temperature, the part geometry, the presence or not of the ignition source, ect. Through the action of fire, certain polymers burn easily, others with difficulty or even not at all.

    • Classification* according to UL94 
    • Oxygen Index (ISO 4589)
      The Oxygen Index is certainly one of the most relevant tests, easy to reproduce. The test consists of measuring the critical oxygen concentration in a mixture O2 - N2, allowing inflammation under defined conditions. If the Oxygen index is lower than 21%, the material will burn easily in air after removing the ignition source. The higher the Oxygen index, the more difficult the material will ignite.

    Classification*

    according to UL94

    Thickness

    3.0 mm      6.0 mm

    Oxygen index
    ASTM D 2863
    ISO 4589
    Ertalon® 6 SAHBHB25
    Ertalon® 66 SAHBHB26
    Ertalon® 66 SA-CHBHB24
    Ertalon® 4.6HBHB24
    Ertalon® 66-GF30HBHB-
    Ertalon® 6 PLAHBHB25
    Ertalon® 6 XAU+HBHB25
    Ertalon® LFXHBHB-
    Nylatron® MC 901HBHB25
    Nylatron® GSMHBHB25
    Nylatron® NSMHBHB-
    Nylatron® GSHBHB26
    Ertacetal® CHBHB15
    Ertacetal® HHBHB15
    Ertacetal® H-TFHBHB-
    Ertalyte®HBHB25
    Ertalyte® TXHBHB25
    PC 1000HBHB25
    Duratron® PBIV-0V-058
    Duratron® T4203 PAIV-0V-045
    Duratron® T4301 PAIV-0V-044
    Duratron® T5530 PAIV-0V-050
    Ketron® PEEK-1000V-0V-035
    Ketron® PEEK-HPVV-0V-043
    Ketron® PEEK-GF30V-0V-040
    Ketron® PEEK-CA30V-0V-040
    Techtron® HPV PPSV-0V-047
    Quadrant® PPSUV-0V-044
    Duratron® U1000 PEIV-0V-047
    Quadrant® PSU 1000HBHB30
    Fluorosint® 500V-0V-0-
    Fluorosint® 207V-0V-0-
    Semitron® ESd 225-HB< 20
    Semitron® ESd 410CV-0V-047
    Semitron® ESd 500HRV-0V-0-
    Semitron® ESd 520HRV-0V-048

    Note: These mostly estimated ratings, derived from raw material supplier data, are not intended to reflect hazards presented by materials under actual fire conditions.

  • keyboard_arrow_downOutgassing

    In 1995, a number of Quadrant Engineering Plastic Products materials were tested according to the European Space Agency (ESA)-specification PSS-01-702 ("A thermal vacuum test for the screening of space materials"). Samples were heated to 125°C for 24 hours (Method "A"), collector plates kept at 25°C and the testing carried out in a vacuum of 10-3 P.


    TML (%) RML (%) CVCM (%)
    Ertalon® 66 SA 1.3 0.17 0.002
    Ertalon® 6 PLA 1.5 0.06 0.005
    Ertacetal® C 0.34 0.13 0.016
    Ertacetal® H 0.47 0.24 0.005
    Ertalyte® 0.33 0.2 0.005
    Ertalyte® TX 0.25 0.03 0.003
    Duratron® PBI 2.2 0.84 0.014
    Duratron® T4203 PAI 1.9 0.93 0.007
    Duratron® T4301 PAI 1.4 0.42 0.018
    Ketron® PEEK-1000 0.26 0.03 0.003
    Ketron® PEEK-HPV 0.16 0.02 0.003
    Techtron® HPV PPS 0.06 0.02 0.003
    Duratron® U1000 PEI 0.82 0.32 0.002
    Quadrant® PSU 1000 0.49 0.09 0.002


    TML = Total Mass Loss
    RML =  Recovered Mass Loss
    CVCM = Collected Volatile Condensed Material

  • keyboard_arrow_downSteam Sterilisation

    Steam sterilization is commonly used in the medical industry for sterilizing all kinds of reusable equipment, devices, instruments, trays, ect. and is conducted in a pressurized vessel that allows the presence of superheated saturated steam. The main purpose of sterilization is to kill all viable micro-organisms on a certain part.     

    Tests in which the effect of repeated steam sterilization on the charpy notched impact strength was measured according to ISO 179-1/1eA (measured on dry test specimens at 23°C) clearly show that :

    • Duratron® U1000 PEI, Ketron® PEEK-1000 and Quadrant® PPSU are very suitable for repeated steam sterilization      
    • Quadrant® PSU 1000 and Techtron® HPV PPS also offer good steam sterilization, up to 500 cycles
    • Ertacetal® C and Ertalyte® can be used for parts which will only be steam sterilized a few times.
Contact
keyboard_arrow_down